Legal Opinion

Hurley v. Board of Review of the Industrial Commission of Utah, Department of Employment Security

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1988No. 20828, 20892, 20931 and 21045PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Justice:

The petitioners seek reversal of an order of the Board of Review of the Utah Industrial Commission denying them certain benefits under the Trade Act of 1974, 88 Stat. 1978, 19 U.S.C. §§ 2101-2487 (1982), as amended.

The Trade Act provides financial assistance (TRA benefits) to workers who are laid off by companies whose operations are adversely affected by foreign competition. TRA benefits are to assist in helping qualified employees to retrain and to find other jobs. To be eligible for TRA benefits, a claimant must establish that (1) the discharge from employment occurred no…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Industrial Com'n of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Clearfield City v. Department of Employment SecurityUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Pinter Construction Co. v. FrisbyUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Salt Lake City Corp. v. ConferUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Gray v. Department of Employment SecurityUtah Supreme Court · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Morton International, Inc. v. Auditing Division of the Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Savage Industries, Inc. v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  3. First National Bank of Boston v. County Board of EqualizationUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Chris & Dick's Lumber & Hardware v. Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Sandy City v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1992

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API