Heinecke v. Department of Commerce, Division of Occupational & Professional Licensing
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ORME, Judge:
Petitioner seeks review of the revocation of his nursing license by the Division of Occupational and Professional Licensing for having sexual relations with a troubled former patient which culminated in the patient’s pregnancy. We affirm.
FACTS
The facts set forth are based on the evidence presented at Richard C. Hei-necke’s hearing before the Utah State Board of Nursing. 1 According to the evidence, prior to the revocation of his nursing license, Heinecke was a registered nurse with approximately fifteen years experience. From September 17, 1987, until April 15, 1988,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Megdal v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Grace Drilling Co. v. Board of ReviewCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
- Mountain States Broadcasting Co. v. NealeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
- Tuma v. Board of NursingIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
- Vance v. FordhamUtah Supreme Court · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- West Valley City v. Majestic Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1991
- DeBry v. Cascade EnterprisesUtah Supreme Court · 1994
- Maverik Country Stores, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
- Bhatia v. Department of Employment SecurityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992
- Department of the Air Force v. SwiderCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.