Legal Opinion

Heinecke v. Department of Commerce, Division of Occupational & Professional Licensing

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided April 11, 1991No. 890682-CAPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ORME, Judge:

Petitioner seeks review of the revocation of his nursing license by the Division of Occupational and Professional Licensing for having sexual relations with a troubled former patient which culminated in the patient’s pregnancy. We affirm.

FACTS

The facts set forth are based on the evidence presented at Richard C. Hei-necke’s hearing before the Utah State Board of Nursing. 1 According to the evidence, prior to the revocation of his nursing license, Heinecke was a registered nurse with approximately fifteen years experience. From September 17, 1987, until April 15, 1988,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Megdal v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Grace Drilling Co. v. Board of ReviewCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  3. Mountain States Broadcasting Co. v. NealeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  4. Tuma v. Board of NursingIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Vance v. FordhamUtah Supreme Court · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. West Valley City v. Majestic Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1991
  2. DeBry v. Cascade EnterprisesUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Maverik Country Stores, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
  4. Bhatia v. Department of Employment SecurityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992
  5. Department of the Air Force v. SwiderCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API