Legal Opinion

State v. Menzies

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1992No. 880161PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Chief Justice:

Ralph Leroy Menzies appeals from the denial of his motion for a new trial. We affirm. The issue on appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion in ruling that the record is sufficient for appellate review.

On March 8, 1988, after a jury trial, Menzies was convicted of first degree murder, 1 a capital offense, and aggravated kid-naping, 2 a first degree felony. He waived the right to a jury for the penalty phase of the proceedings, and the trial court sentenced him to death. On May 26, 1988, he filed a docketing statement in this court, raising twenty-nine issues…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Jurek v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Draper v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Parker v. DuggerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State v. MenziesUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. MaestasUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State v. LaffertyUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Salt Lake City v. OhmsUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Menzies v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2014

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API