Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Brown

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 19, 1981No. 2646PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIPEZ, Judge:

In a jury trial, appellant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance (marijuana) and possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver. Post-verdict motions were timely filed. The court below arrested judgment on the charge of possession with intent to deliver, since it had not been charged in the original information, but only added by amendment, in violation of Pa.R.Crim.P. 229 and Commonwealth v. Herstine, 264 Pa.Super. 414, 399 A.2d 1118 (1979). Post-verdict relief was denied in all other respects. This appeal is from the judgment of sentence of six to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RigginsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Commonwealth v. LuddySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Commonwealth v. HerstineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Commonwealth v. MasonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Commonwealth v. DuffySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Jones v. ScurrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  4. Commonwealth v. MartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. LynchSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API