Commonwealth v. Luddy
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
SPAETH, Judge:
This is a consolidated appeal by three members of the same family, Filomena Luddy and her sons Edmund and Michael. Filomena Luddy, appellant in No. 615, and Edmund Luddy, appellant in No. 616, were convicted of unlawful possession of a controlled substance. Michael Luddy, appellant in No. 514, was convicted of unlawful possession of a controlled substance, possession with intent to manufacture or deliver a controlled substance, and conspiracy. Three issues have been raised: 1) whether the evidence was sufficient to support Filomena Luddy’s conviction; 2) whether Edmund Luddy was…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Manley v. FitzgeraldCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Commonwealth v. BoatwrightSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. CarterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.