Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Herstine

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 16, 1979No. 1014PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIPEZ, Judge:

This is an appeal by the Commonwealth from the grant of defendant’s motion in arrest of judgment. A written complaint had been filed on June 27,1977, against the defendant charging her with retail theft, second offense. The information filed on September 9, 1977, failed to mention second offense. Before trial the Commonwealth requested and was granted leave to amend its information to include second offense in the description of the crime. In a jury trial the defendant was convicted of the amended charge. The defendant then filed motions for a new trial and in arrest of judgment.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. SissonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Commonwealth v. KoczwaraSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Commonwealth v. HellerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Commonwealth v. MosesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. AponteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Commonwealth v. SinclairSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Commonwealth v. TingleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Commonwealth v. ReaganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Commonwealth v. GamberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API