Commonwealth v. Smith
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Roberts,
Following a joint trial by jury, appellant and a codefendant were found guilty of murder in the first degree and sentenced to life imprisonment. On this direct appeal from the judgment of sentence,1 appellant attacks the sufficiency of the evidence and challenges three rulings by the court during trial. Finding appellant’s contentions unpersuasive, we affirm.
The Commonwealth’s evidence established that on January 15, 1972, George Fautz, a barber, was brutally beaten and robbed in his Harrisburg shop. Later that day, appellant on two separate occasions discussed…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GarvinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth v. GoosbySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. MartinolichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. NeillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Commonwealth v. YuknavichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Commonwealth v. RoseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. RobsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. MyrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. MurraySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. RaganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.