Valerus Compression Services, LP and Valerus Services Company, LLC v. William Austin

OPINION

REBECA HUDDLE, Justice.

The underlying dispute concerns the propriety of the forced redemption of William Austin’s partnership interests in Vale-ras Compression Services, L.P. by Valeras Compression Services, L.P. and Valeras Services Company, LLC (collectively “Val-eras”). In two interlocutory appeals, Vale-ras challenges the trial court’s orders (1) denying Valeras’s motion to compel arbitration of Austin’s claims and (2) granting Austin’s motion to stay the parallel arbitration proceeding brought by Valeras. See Tex. Crv. Prac. & Rem.Code Ann. § 171.098(a) (West 2011). 1 We conclude…