Legal Opinion

In Re AdvancePCS Health L.P.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 2005No. 04-0182PublishedCited by 279 opinions

1Per curiam

We are once again called upon to decide the enforceability of an arbitration provision, this time in transactions between a pharmacy benefits management company and member pharmacies. The trial court denied the management company’s motion to compel arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). See 9 U.S.C. §§ 1-16. The court of appeals summarily denied mandamus relief. Because the parties’ contracts clearly require arbitration, we once again grant conditional mandamus relief.

AdvancePCS Health L.P. (PCS) 1 processes and adjudicates claims for reimbursement between member pharmacies and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. J.M. Davidson, Inc. v. WebsterTexas Supreme Court · 2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by279 opinions

  1. In Re Poly-America, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
  2. In Re Palm Harbor Homes, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
  3. In Re Merrill Lynch Trust Co. FSBTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  4. In Re RubiolaTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  5. In Re 24R, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2010

274 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API