In Re AdvancePCS Health L.P.
Texas Supreme Court
1Per curiam
We are once again called upon to decide the enforceability of an arbitration provision, this time in transactions between a pharmacy benefits management company and member pharmacies. The trial court denied the management company’s motion to compel arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). See 9 U.S.C. §§ 1-16. The court of appeals summarily denied mandamus relief. Because the parties’ contracts clearly require arbitration, we once again grant conditional mandamus relief.
AdvancePCS Health L.P. (PCS) 1 processes and adjudicates claims for reimbursement between member pharmacies and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- J.M. Davidson, Inc. v. WebsterTexas Supreme Court · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by279 opinions
- In Re Poly-America, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
- In Re Palm Harbor Homes, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
- In Re Merrill Lynch Trust Co. FSBTexas Supreme Court · 2007
- In Re RubiolaTexas Supreme Court · 2011
- In Re 24R, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2010
274 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.