Legal Opinion
Valero Energy Corp. v. Teco Pipeline Co.
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
Decided October 7, 1999No. 14-96-01234-CVPublishedCited by 106 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JOHN S. ANDERSON, Justice.
This is an interlocutory appeal of an order denying a motion to stay proceedings and compel arbitration. See Tex. Civ. PRAC. & Rem.Code Ann. § 171.098(a) (Vernon Supp.1999). 1 Teco Pipeline Company has sued Valero Energy Corp., 24 related companies, and two officers and directors, Stan L. McLelland and William L. Gree-hey (collectively “Valero”). 2 Valero filed a motion to stay proceedings and compel arbitration. In response, Teco filed a motion to stay arbitration. The trial court granted Teco’s motion, while denying Vale-ro’s motion. In two points of error,…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Schlumberger Technology Corp. v. SwansonTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re Oakwood Mobile Homes, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
- Sunkist Soft Drinks, Inc., Del Monte Corporation, Nabisco Brands, Inc. v. Sunkist Growers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- Kline v. O'QUINNCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by106 opinions
- In Re Vesta Insurance Group, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
- Zabinski v. Bright Acres AssociatesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- Williams Industries, Inc. v. Earth Development Systems Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
- AutoNation USA Corp. v. Leroy, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
- In Re Education Management Corp., Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.