Legal Opinion

In Re Firstmerit Bank, N.A.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 2001No. 00-0548PublishedCited by 945 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Enoch

FirstMerit Bank and Mobile Consultants seek mandamus relief after the trial court denied their motion to compel arbitration. Because the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) requires the trial court to compel arbitration in this case, we conditionally grant their petition and order the trial court to compel arbitration in accordance with the parties’ agreement.

I. BACKGROUND

Pete and Janie de los Santos purchased a mobile home for their daughter, Sarah, and her husband, Gary Alvarez. They bought the home from Verde Homes under Verde’s retail installment financing agreement. Verde assigned this…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Formosa Plastics Corp. USA v. Presidio Engineers and Contractors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by945 opinions

  1. In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Johnson v. Brewer & Pritchard, P.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  3. In Re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Perry Homes v. CullTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  5. In Re D. Wilson Const. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2006

940 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API