Legal Opinion
City of Danbury v. International Ass'n of Firefighters, Local 801
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 25, 1992No. 14218PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGlass, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the plaintiff, the city of Danbury, was required under General Statutes § 7-473c (a),1 after a negotia*245tion impasse, to participate in mandatory and binding arbitration with the named defendant, International Association of Firefighters, Local 801 (union), concerning the establishment of a paramedic unit within the Danbury fire department. The defendant state board of mediation and arbitration determined that the city was required to participate in mandatory and binding arbitration over the controversy and issued an award favorable to the union.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Allied Chemical & Alkali Workers of America, Local Union No. 1 v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- National Labor Relations Board v. Wooster Division of Borgwarner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- First National Maintenance Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- American Universal Insurance v. DelGrecoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Poole v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Success Centers, Inc. v. Huntington Learning Centers, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Foti v. RichardsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Fyber Properties Killingworth Ltd. Partnership v. ShanoffSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Honulik v. Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.