Legal Opinion
Foti v. Richardson
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 23, 1993No. 10870PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchaller, J.
The principal issue in this appeal is whether a person who is autistic but not mentally retarded is eligible for the services of the department of mental retardation (department). The plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the trial court, in an administrative appeal, finding him ineligible for the services of the department. On appeal to this court, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly (1) concluded *465that General Statutes § 17a-215 (formerly § 19a-462) does not operate to make persons who are not mentally retarded eligible for services, and (2) concluded that the commissioner’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- State v. BlaskoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Connecticut State Medical Society v. Connecticut Board of ExaminersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Battersby v. BattersbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Arway v. BloomConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Rayhall v. Akim Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. LongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Baerst v. State Board of EducationConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Cameron v. AlanderConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- In re Enrique S.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.