Legal Opinion

Fyber Properties Killingworth Ltd. Partnership v. Shanoff

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 8, 1994No. 14713PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.

The question presented in this appeal is whether, in the circumstances of this case, a subdivision should properly have been assessed for purposes of municipal taxation as individual subdivision lots *477rather than as unsubdivided land. The plaintiff, Fyber Properties Killingworth Limited Partnership, appeals1 from the judgment of the trial court dismissing its appeal from the assessment of property value by the named defendant, Donna Shanoff (defendant), the tax assessor for the town of Killingworth.2 The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly concluded that pursuant to General…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  2. State v. BlaskoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  3. Smith v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  4. Red Maple Properties v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  5. Department of Administrative Services v. Employees' Review BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hartford/Windsor Healthcare Properties, LLC v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  2. DeSena v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  3. Pauker v. RoigSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  4. Doe v. Bridgeport Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2001
  5. Abel v. PLANNING & ZON. COM'N OF NEW CANAANSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API