Wilderness Cove, Ltd. v. Cold Spring Granite Co.
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
1Opinion of the Court
MACK KIDD, Justice.
Wilderness Cove, Ltd. (‘Wilderness Cove”) appeals the judgment of the trial court declaring that Cold Spring Granite Company (“Cold Spring”) holds an undivided interest in the granite on the property that is the subject of this lawsuit, and that Cold Spring may enter that property to quarry and remove its granite. The issues presented by this appeal are: (1) did the acquisition of the granite by Cold Spring’s predecessor give it a severable estate in land, i.e., the granite deposit in place, and if so, (2) is the severable granite estate the dominant estate? These appear to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Plainsman Trading Co. v. CrewsTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Altman v. BlakeTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Burnham v. Hardy Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1917
- Heinatz v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 1949
- Acker v. GuinnTexas Supreme Court · 1971
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rife v. KerrCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Cold Spring Granite Company v. Mark L. Karrasch and Dakota D. Karrasch, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002
- Anna Maria Salinas Saenz v. Thorp Petroleum Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2015
- Cactus Water Services, LLC v. COG Operating, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2023
- Cold Spring Granite Company v. Mark L. Karrasch and Dakota D. Karrasch, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.