Legal Opinion

Plainsman Trading Co. v. Crews

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1995No. 94-0641PublishedCited by 147 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHightower, Justice

in which PHILLIPS, C.J., and GONZALEZ, HECHT, CORNYN, ENOCH, SPECTOR, and OWEN, JJ., join.

In this declaratory judgment action, we must decide whether the surface destruction test applies to a non-participating royalty interest created prior to June 8, 1983. Because a non-participating royalty is an interest in property which is carved only from the mineral estate, and because the disputed uranium in this case belongs to the surface owner by application of the surface destruction test,1 we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

The Richardson Heirs are successors in interest to a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Human Services v. E.B.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Acord v. General Motors Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Lemos v. MontezTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Altman v. BlakeTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Benge v. ScharbauerTexas Supreme Court · 1953

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by147 opinions

  1. Interstate Northborough Partnership v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. In Re BassTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  3. KCM Financial LLC v. BradshawTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Weidner v. Sanchez, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
  5. Louisiana-Pacific Corp. v. KnightenTexas Supreme Court · 1998

142 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API