Legal Opinion

Cold Spring Granite Company v. Mark L. Karrasch and Dakota D. Karrasch

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided October 31, 2002No. 03-02-00399-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACK KIDD, Justice.

Cold Spring Granite Company appeals from the trial court’s order denying its application for a temporary injunction to halt the construction of a house being built for Mark and Dakota Karrasch. We will affirm.

Factual and Procedural Background

Cold Spring’s application for an injunction against the Karrasehes stems from ongoing litigation. 1 The underlying litigation arose because Wilderness Cove, which owns the surface and a one-half granite interest in the property at issue, desired to develop approximately thirty acres fronting Lake LBJ (“the subdivision”). Cold Spring…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Davis v. HueyTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Beaumont Bank, N.A. v. BullerTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Walling v. MetcalfeTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Universal Health Services, Inc. v. Thompson, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Baxter & Associates, L.L.C. D/B/A Baxter Elevators v. D & D Elevators, Inc., David Shaw, Individually, and Donald Moncier, Individually, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2017
  2. Shape Ranch, Ltd., and Hugh Fitzsimons, III v. ENG San Miguel Development, LLC, ETNA Energy, LLC and Endeavor Natural Gas, LP, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API