Legal Opinion

Altman v. Blake

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1986No. C-5143PublishedCited by 143 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KILGARLIN, Justice.

Hazel Altman, Duncan B. Clark, and Ellen Dixon Clark present this court with one issue: whether a mineral interest conveyed in a deed by W.R. Blake, Jr. to his father is a one-sixteenth royalty interest or a one-sixteenth interest in the mineral fee. In a suit filed by Altman and the Clarks against the heirs of W.R. Blake, Sr., both sides moved for summary judgment. The trial court construed the deed to convey a one-sixteenth non-participating royalty interest to Blake, Sr., and rendered judgment for his heirs. The court of appeals affirmed the trial court judgment. 703…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Watkins v. SlaughterTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Alford v. KrumTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Ulbricht v. FriedsamTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Peveto v. StarkeyTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Delta Drilling Company v. SimmonsTexas Supreme Court · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by143 opinions

  1. HECI Exploration Co. v. NeelTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Luckel v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. KCM Financial LLC v. BradshawTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Plainsman Trading Co. v. CrewsTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Concord Oil Co. v. Pennzoil Exploration and Production Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1998

138 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API