Altman v. Blake
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KILGARLIN, Justice.
Hazel Altman, Duncan B. Clark, and Ellen Dixon Clark present this court with one issue: whether a mineral interest conveyed in a deed by W.R. Blake, Jr. to his father is a one-sixteenth royalty interest or a one-sixteenth interest in the mineral fee. In a suit filed by Altman and the Clarks against the heirs of W.R. Blake, Sr., both sides moved for summary judgment. The trial court construed the deed to convey a one-sixteenth non-participating royalty interest to Blake, Sr., and rendered judgment for his heirs. The court of appeals affirmed the trial court judgment. 703…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Watkins v. SlaughterTexas Supreme Court · 1945
- Alford v. KrumTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Ulbricht v. FriedsamTexas Supreme Court · 1959
- Peveto v. StarkeyTexas Supreme Court · 1982
- Delta Drilling Company v. SimmonsTexas Supreme Court · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by143 opinions
- HECI Exploration Co. v. NeelTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Luckel v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- KCM Financial LLC v. BradshawTexas Supreme Court · 2015
- Plainsman Trading Co. v. CrewsTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Concord Oil Co. v. Pennzoil Exploration and Production Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
138 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.