Legal Opinion

Burnham v. Hardy Oil Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1917No. 2453PublishedCited by 120 opinions

Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Fourth District, in. an appeal from Matagorda County. Burnham and others sued the Hardy Oil Company and others for the recovery of land. Defendants had verdict and judgment under peremptory instructions. Plaintiffs appealed ; and the judgment, affirmed as to the others, was reversed and remanded as to two appellants, Legge and Far jeon. All the defendants applied for and obtained writ of error.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Chiep Justice PHILLIPS

delivered the opinion of the court.

The suit was by James H. Burnham and others, representing the interest of Emily Parker, a daughter of Henry Parker and Henrietta Parker, his wife, for approximately an undivided one-fourth interest in a league of land originally granted to Henry Parker, constituting community property of himself and wife, Henrietta, conveyed by Henry Parker, after the death of his wife, to his son, Wm. E. Parker, to whom, by the will of Henry Parker, which was duly probated, it was also devised.

The defendants held the title thus conveyed and devised…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Dunn v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Patty v. MiddletonTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Baldwin v. RootTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Edwards v. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Hill v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1884

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by120 opinions

  1. Leyva v. PachecoTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Slaughter v. QuallsTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Binford v. SnyderTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Prize Energy Resources, L.P. v. Cliff Hoskins, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2011
  5. Glover v. Union Pacific Railroad, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006

115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API