Legal Opinion

Heinatz v. Allen

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1949No. A-1872PublishedCited by 109 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Smedley

*514The controversy is as to the ownership of or right to the commercial limestone in a. tract of land containing 400 acres in Travis and Williamson Counties. The land was owned by Mrs. Emilie Heinatz, who devised to her daughter, Dora Heinatz, “the surface rights exclusive of the mineral rights” and to trustees for all of her children “the mineral rights”.

In this suit by petitioners, who claim under the trustees, against respondents, who claim under Dora Heinatz, judgment was rendered by the district court in favor of petitioners against respondents for the title and possession of the mineral…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson & Kerr Drilling Co. v. BruhlmeyerTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Northern Pacific Railway Company v. SoderbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. Travers v. ReinhardtSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. Elliott v. NelsonTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Luse v. BoatmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by109 opinions

  1. Biggers v. Continental Bus System, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Stewart v. SelderTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Acker v. GuinnTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Moser v. United States Steel Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Dyegard Land Partnership v. HooverCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001

104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API