Legal Opinion

Patrin v. Progressive Rehab Options

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 12, 1993No. CX-92-1078PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COYNE, Justice.

This workers’ compensation claim is before us by certiorari on the relation of Mary Patrin, the employee, to review a decision of the workers’ compensation court of appeals reversing the compensation judge’s award of benefits for temporary partial disability. We affirm the decision of the WCCA.

The employee sustained a compensable cervical injury on July 5, 1988. Her employer, Progressive Rehab Options, paid compensation for temporary total disability until January 1, 1991, when Patrin began working for a different employer, Community Involvement Programs, at a reduced wage.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Parson v. Holman Erection Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Kirchner v. County of AnokaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Griebel v. Tri-State Insurance Co. of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. Tews v. Geo. A. Hormel & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  5. Kirchner v. County of AnokaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
  2. Santillana v. Central Minnesota Council on AgingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  3. Klinefelter v. Crum & Forster Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  4. Busch v. Advanced MaintenanceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  5. Haus Cx v. Minnesota Rebar CxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API