Legal Opinion
Rodriguez v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 3, 2019No. A17-1800PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THISSEN, Justice.
This case requires us to determine whether respondent Jennifer Rodriguez, a bus driver who was injured in a motor vehicle accident while working, may seek reimbursement for chiropractic services related to her injury from appellant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. (State Farm), her personal automobile no-fault insurer.
FACTS
Following the accident, Rodriguez sought and received chiropractic care at ChiroFirst and reported the accident to her employer. Her employer's workers' compensation carrier, Old Republic Insurance, agreed to pay workers' compensation benefits.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State of Minnesota v. Brandon Wayne RiggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Wegener v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Schatz v. Interfaith Care CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. MauerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Laase v. 2007 Chevrolet TahoeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Drake Snell v. Tim Walz, Governor of Minnesota, in his official capacity, ...Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
- American Family Insurance Company a/s/o Nicholas Oelke v. NB Electric, Inc. dba East Side Garage Doors, ...Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2025
- Christina Berrier v. Minnesota State PatrolSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
- Cities Management, Inc., Relator v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2023
- Humana MarketPoint, Inc., Relator, vs. Commissioner of Revenue, RespondentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2025
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.