Legal Opinion

Parson v. Holman Erection Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 5, 1988No. C5-87-1037PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*74COYNE, Justice.

The primary issue raised by this appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals is whether an employee whose work-related injury has reached maximum medical improvement, who has been paid economic recovery compensation, but who has no employment is eligible for temporary partial compensation at the temporary total compensation rate. Concluding that temporary partial compensation is not available under these circumstances, we reverse.

On September 11, 1981, the employee suffered an injury to his right knee while employed by Sowles, Inc., as an iron worker on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carlson v. SmogardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  2. Tracy v. Streater/Litton IndustriesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. Joyce v. Lewis Bolt & Nut Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Patton v. Thompson Electric Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Schatz v. Interfaith Care CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  2. Reider v. Anoka-Hennepin School District No. 11Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  3. Jacka v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  4. Boryca v. Marvin Lumber & CedarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  5. DeNardo v. Divine Redeemer Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API