Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Kirchner v. County of Anoka

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 21, 1987No. C4-86-1195, C7-86-1210PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WAHL, Justice.

This workers’ compensation matter is before us again following remand in Kirchner v. County of Anoka (Kirchner I), 339 N.W.2d 908 (Minn.1983). Employee Mervin Kirchner was injured in 1977 while working for the County of Anoka (county) and again in 1979 while working for the county at lower wages. We held that he was entitled to temporary partial disability benefits based on his wages at the time of the first injury, and temporary total disability benefits based on his wages at the time of the second injury. We remanded the matter for computation of benefits. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hengemuhle v. Long Prairie JayceesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Tracy v. Streater/Litton IndustriesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. Kirchner v. County of AnokaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. Lease v. Pemtom, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  5. Patnode v. Lyon's Food Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Patrin v. Progressive Rehab OptionsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  3. Busch v. Advanced MaintenanceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  4. Sundby v. City of St. PeterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  5. Sundquist v. Kaiser Engineers, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API