Legal Opinion

Tews v. Geo. A. Hormel & Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 14, 1988No. C5-88-464PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COYNE, Justice.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals affirming, by majority decision, an award of temporary partial compensation based on earning capacity for periods of unemployment in addition to temporary partial compensation based on post-injury wages for periods of employment to be paid concurrently with economic recovery compensation for a 7% whole body impairment. We affirm all but the award of temporary benefits based upon a finding of earning capacity for that period the employee was not working.

On July 24, 1984, the employee sustained…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Parson v. Holman Erection Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Patton v. Thompson Electric Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Brennan v. BrennanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  4. Winchester v. Pako Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Estate of Hartz v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  2. Dille v. Knox Lumber/Division of Southwest ForestSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Patrin v. Progressive Rehab OptionsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  4. In Re the Estate of OpsahlCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  5. Bari v. Control Data Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API