Capital Nat'l Bank of Sacramento v. Stoll

THE COURT.

We hereby adopt the following portions of our former opinion as a statement of the facts and issues presented in this case:

“This appeal is from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs declaring that a contract employing the defendant Edwin P. Stoll was terminated by the incompetency of his father and employer, John T. Stoll, and restraining the defendant Edwin P. Stoll from interfering with the possession of the property or its management by the guardian. The facts necessary to understand the controversy are few and free from complications. All the defendants are sons of John T. Stoll,…