Legal Opinion
Pacific Landmark Hotel, Ltd. v. Marriott Hotels, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 18, 1993No. D019074PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HUFFMAN, Acting P. J.
This is an expedited appeal from an order of the trial court filed June 4, 1993, denying a preliminary injunction, the effect of which is to prevent the owners of a twin towers hotel, known as the San Diego Marriott Hotel and Marina (the Hotel), managed by Marriott Hotels, Inc. (MHI), 1 from statutorily terminating MHI’s management contracts pending resolution of the owners’ lawsuit against MHI for breach of those contracts and numerous other causes of action. Because the court’s denial was based on its interpretation and application of Civil Code section 2356,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hunt v. Rousmanier's AdministratorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
- Mesler v. Bragg Management Co.California Supreme Court · 1985
- Las Palmas Associates v. Las Palmas Center AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Harm v. FrasherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Bullock v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Communist Party of the United States of Amerika v. 522 Valencia, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
- Sahlolbei v. Providence Healthcare, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Bonfigli v. StrachanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Government Guarantee Fund of Republic of Finland v. Hyatt CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Government Guarantee Fund v. Hyatt Corp.District Court, Virgin Islands · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.