Legal Opinion

Bridge v. Kedon

California Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 1912No. S.F. No. 5796PublishedCited by 43 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

The appeal is from the judgment.

The plaintiff sued to enforce a grant or assignment of the expectant interest of the appellant in the estate of his mother, who was then living, to Henry S. Bridge as trustee. Apparently he was trustee for Carrie E. Bridge, and for that reason she is made a party plaintiff, although she was not named in the assignment. It was made as security for the payment of certain sums of money loaned by Bridge "to the appellant, for which he executed four notes amounting to fourteen hundred dollars. Prior to the death of his mother, Kedon was duly adjudged a bankrupt,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of GarcelonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Pierce v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Fletcher v. MoreyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1843
  4. Bergson v. Builders Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1869
  5. McCall's Adm'r v. HamptonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Grimm v. GrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. DuffillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Estate of YoellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Bank of California v. ConnollyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. De La Torre v. CashCall, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2018

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API