Rogers v. Schlotterback
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sonoma County. Emmet Sea well, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
This is an action brought against .the grantees and distributees of William H. Rogers, deceased, and P. L. Schlotterback, the husband of one of said grantees and distributees, to specifically enforce an alleged oral contract made by said William H. Rogers for the benefit of James Taylor Rogers, by subjecting certain property held by such grantees and distributees to the claims of said James Taylor Rogers under said contract. The action was commenced by said James Taylor Rogers, but he having died, his administrator and heirs have been substituted in his stead. Judgment went for the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Owens v. McNallyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Lathrop v. BamptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Winne v. . WinneNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- McCabe v. HealyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- More v. MoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Brewer v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Clevenger v. ClevengerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- O'Brien v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Bernkrant v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.