Legal Opinion

O'CONNELL v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1935No. S. F. 15245PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

This is an application for a writ of mandate to be directed to the respondent superior court and compelling it to grant a motion, duly made, for substitution of attorneys in an action therein pending. The respondent has answered and demurred generally to the petition. Counsel of record in the court below refused to join in a stipulation substituting him out of the case and opposed the motion for substitution of attorneys on the ground that petitioner had theretofore, and in writing, conferred on him an irrevocable agency or power coupled with an interest in the subject-matter of the action.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Rousmanier's AdministratorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
  2. Kirk v. CulleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Gage v. AtwaterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Todd v. Superior Court of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Scott v. Superior Court of Alameda CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Isrin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Forslund v. ForslundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Echlin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Woolley v. Embassy Suites, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. Thacker v. American FoundryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API