Legal Opinion

Toland's Case

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 2, 1927PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHugo, C.J.

The injury arose out of and in the course of the employment while the employee was at work “as a stationary engineer on a dredge of the subscriber which was engaged in digging into the land side of the harbor to enlarge the capacity of a dock in Boston Harbor.” The employee was required by G. L. c. 146, § 49, to have a license as a stationary engineer from this Commonwealth, but was not required by the laws of the United States to have a marine engineer’s license. The evidence shows that the dredge was without motive power and could not move itself. It had been towed to its place, was afloat,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Grant Smith-Porter Ship Co. v. RohdeSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Young v. DuncanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  4. Millers' Indemnity Underwriters v. BraudSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. United States v. Standard Brewery, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Armburg v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  2. Moores's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  3. Dourrieu v. Bd. Com'rs Port of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Herbert's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  5. Commonwealth v. New England Transportation Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API