Legal Opinion

Herbert's Case

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 27, 1933PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

The main question for decision is whether this claim can be prosecuted under the workmen’s compensation act or whether it is outside the scope of that act because within the exclusive jurisdiction of admiralty. The pertinent facts are these: The deceased employee worked on a scow used by his employer only to carry garbage from Boston over navigable waters to Spectacle Island where it was unloaded. That island is distant about two miles from the shore and is in Boston harbor within the city of Boston. The scow was part of the time at Dorchester on the shore of the mainland and part of the time…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Grant Smith-Porter Ship Co. v. RohdeSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Atlantic Transport Co. of W. Va. v. ImbrovekSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Spencer Kellogg & Sons, Inc. v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Young v. DuncanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Davis v. Department of Labor and Industries of Wash.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Moores's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  3. Motor Boat Sales, Inc. v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
  4. Garrisey v. Westshore Marina AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  5. Wolf's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API