Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. New England Transportation Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 30, 1933PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

Trial by jury upon these complaints was waived, they were submitted upon a single case stated, requests by the defendant for rulings were denied, the defendant was found guilty, fines were imposed, and sentences were stayed.

A single bill of exceptions by the defendant covering both complaints brings the cases here according to correct procedure applicable alike to civil and criminal practice. Barrell v. Globe Newspaper Co. 268 Mass. 99, 101-102.

The defendant is charged with violations of St. 1931, c. 399, on different dates. Its provisions, so far as here material, summarily stated are that…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Sproles v. BinfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Hendrick v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Frost & Frost Trucking Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Smith v. CahoonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bowe v. Secretary of CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  2. Dexter v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  3. University Overland Express, Inc. v. AlsopSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
  4. Commonwealth v. WallaceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  5. Apger v. New York Central RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API