Legal Opinion

United States v. Standard Brewery, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 5, 1920No. 458, 474PublishedCited by 114 opinions

ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT. OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND. , ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. The cases are stated in, the opinion. This act was passed under the special war powers of Congress. Its primary purpose was the withdrawal of man-power and/foodstuffs from nonessential employment and their devotion to employment necessary for the successful conduct of the war..

Read the full summary

ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT. OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND. , ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. The cases are stated in, the opinion. This act was passed under the special war powers of Congress. Its primary purpose was the withdrawal of man-power and/foodstuffs from nonessential employment and their devotion to employment necessary for the successful conduct of the war.. For this Congress could prohibit the manufacture of nonintoxicating as well as intoxicating beverages.- "What was done was to place a ban upon certain…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Day

These causes are here under the Criminal Appeals Act, March 2, 1907, ■ c. 2564, 34 Stat. 1246, and require the construction of the so-called. “War-Time Prohibition Act,” of November 21, 1918, c. 212, 40 Stat. 1045, 1046, 1047.

In No. 458 the Standard Brewery, Incorporated, was indicted for unlawfully using certain grains, cereals,-fruit, and other food products on the 4th of June, 1919, in the manufacture and production of beer for beverage purposes which, it is charged, contained as much as'one-half of one per cent, of alcohol by both weight and volume. In No. 474 the American Brewing Company…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. United States Ex Rel. Attorney General of the United States v. Delaware & Hudson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. United States v. Jin Fuey MoySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Evans v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Market Co. v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1879

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by114 opinions

  1. United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. LovettSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Jama v. Immigration and Customs EnforcementSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Reinecke v. Northern Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. Blodgett v. HoldenSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API