Legal Opinion

Ethicon, Inc. v. United States Surgical Corp.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided September 9, 1996No. 5:89CV00386 (RNC)PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO CORRECT INVENTORSHIP

CHATIGNY, District Judge.

This is a patent infringement ease brought by Inbae Yoon, M.D., the sole inventor named in the patent, and his exclusive licensee, Ethicon, Inc., against defendant United States Surgical Corporation. The case is before me on a motion by U.S. Surgical and intervenor-defendant Young Jae Choi to correct the patent to add Choi as a coinventor pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 256. Alternatively, U.S. Surgical seeks a declaration that the patent is unenforceable due to inequitable conduct before the Patent and Trademark Office. 1

A…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  2. Tome v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Hybritech Incorporated v. Monoclonal Antibodies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  4. Smithkline Diagnostics, Inc. v. Helena Laboratories Corporation, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  5. Richard C. Price v. Dale R. SymsekCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ethicon, Inc. And Inbae Yoon, M.D. v. United States Surgical Corporation and Young Jae ChoiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  2. Nartron Corp. v. Schukra U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  3. Finkelstein v. MardkhaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  4. Abbott GmbH & Co. v. Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
  5. Netscape Communications Corp. v. Valueclick, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API