Legal Opinion
Hybritech Incorporated v. Monoclonal Antibodies, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 19, 1986No. Appeal 86-531PublishedCited by 430 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICH, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is from the August 28, 1985, decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 623 F.Supp. 1344, 227 USPQ 215, in favor of defendant Monoclonal Antibodies, Inc. (Monoclonal) holding that all 29 claims of plaintiff’s patent No. 4,376,110 entitled “Immunometric Assays Using Monoclonal Antibodies” (’110 patent), issued to Dr. Gary S. David and Howard E. Greene and assigned to Hybritech Incorporated (Hybritech), are invalid as anticipated under 35 U.S.C. § 102(g), for obviousness under § 103, and under § 112 first and second…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- American Hoist & Derrick Company, Cross-Appellee v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by430 opinions
- Kingsdown Medical Consultants, Ltd. And E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. Hollister IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Hybritech Incorporated v. Abbott LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Hill-Rom Services, Inc. v. Stryker CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company v. Phillips Petroleum Company, Phillips 66 Company, and Phillips Driscopipe, Inc., Defendants-Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Pfizer, Inc. v. Apotex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
425 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.