Legal Opinion
Netscape Communications Corp. v. Valueclick, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided January 29, 2010No. 1:09cv225PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
T.S. ELLIS, III, District Judge.
In this patent infringement suit, plaintiff claims that defendants 1 wilfully infringed, and continue to infringe, U.S. Patent No. 5,774, 670 (“the '670 patent”), colloquially known as the “Internet cookies patent.” At issue are the parties’ various motions for summary judgment. More precisely, the parties filed cross-motions as to the following issues:(i) that the '670 patent is invalid pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 102(b), commonly referred to as the “on-sale bar,” which prohibits a patent applicant from obtaining a patent where the claimed…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Pfaff v. Wells Electronics, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fellenz v. Lombard Investment Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2005
- Netscape Communications Corp. v. VALUECLICK, INC.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2010
- Dataquill Ltd. v. High Tech Computer Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 2011
- Investment Technology Group, Inc. v. Liquidnet Holdings, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Paone v. Microsoft Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.