Legal Opinion

Adams v. Martin

California Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1935No. L. A. No. 14855PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is an action against a former guardian of an incompetent to recover money allegedly misappropriated by him.

The defendant became the guardian of Clyde Lindsay, an incompetent, in 1920, and acted as such until 1929. During this period he filed four current accounts in the probate court, claiming credit for various expenditures including board, lodging and laundry of the ward at the rate of $120 per month. On October 15, 1928, plaintiff filed a petition for appointment as guardian ad litem of the ward, asserting that her investigation had disclosed false charges and excessive…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pico v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Lataillade v. OreñaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Guardianship of Di CarloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Cook v. CeasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Guardianship of VucinichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. E. & J. Gallo Winery v. Gallo Cattle Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Gale v. WittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Lazzarone v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Ringwalt v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API