Legal Opinion

Guardianship of Vucinich

California Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1935No. L. A. 14523PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

A hearing was granted in this case after decision by the District Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Two, in order that the question of the effect of approval and settlement of intermediate, current or annual accounts of a guardian might be considered in connection with the case of Estate of Di Carlo, L. A. No. 13937 (ante, p. 225 [44 Pac. (2d) 562]), involving the same question. In the Di Carlo case, we held that such accounts were not conclusive against the ward, but were subject to reexamination. The reasoning set forth in the opinion in Estate of Di Carlo,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of BurdickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Bauer v. BauerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Guardianship of Di CarloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Ex parte CaseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Stevens v. Superior Court of PlacerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Dabney v. PhilleoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Guardianship of Di CarloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Central Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Wilkerson v. SeibCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Watkins v. RivesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API