Legal Opinion

Ringwalt v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n

California Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1935No. S. F. 15072PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

Judgment was entered in favor of defendants after their demurrer to the second amended complaint of plaintiff was sustained without leave to amend. Plaintiffs prosecute this appeal therefrom.

The complaint is in two counts. The first attempts to allege a cause of action against the respondent bank, as executor of the last will and testament of Marie Louise Adams, for failure to sell assets of the estate consisting of stock in the respondent bank and the Bancitaly Corporation, which it is alleged depreciated in value during the course of administration of the estate, in the sum of $33,211.87,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Caldwell v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Security-First National Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Sohler v. SohlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Clavey v. LoneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Jorgensen v. JorgensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Canfield v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Carr v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Farley v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Estate of ChartersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API