Legal Opinion

Decker v. Coleman

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 17, 1969No. 6928SC39PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The order appealed from adversely affects a substantial right ■of the appellants and the appeal is, therefore, not premature. G.S. 1-277; Board of Elders v. Jones, 273 N.C. 174, 159 S.E. 2d 545; Cablevision v. Winston-Salem, 3 N.C. App. 252, 164 S.E. 2d 737.

Appellants’ first contention is that the trial court erred in Its interpretation of the proviso in City Ordinance No. 525; that the language therein that the defendants “be required to maintain inviolate a 50-foot buffer zone,” should not be interpreted, as was done by the trial court, so as to prohibit defendants from “engaging in any…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Guilford County Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  2. Zopfi v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Board of Provincial Elders of the Southern Province of the Moravian Church v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Schloss v. JamisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. Walker v. Town of ElkinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Anderson House, LLC v. Mayor of RockvilleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  2. Kerik v. Davidson CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  3. Massey v. City of CharlotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  4. State v. GarrenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  5. Kerik v. Davidson CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API