Legal Opinion

Kerik v. Davidson County

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 7, 2001No. COA00-660PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNTER, Judge.

Davidson County appeals from the trial court’s judgment declaring the rezoning of certain property owned or subject to an option to purchase by George Sowers (hereinafter “Sowers’ property”) void. On appeal, the primary issue for this Court to determine is whether Davidson County’s amendment of its Zoning Ordinance, which in essence rezoned Sowers’ property, is in fact void. After a careful review of the record and briefs, we reverse the trial court and hold that the Zoning Ordinance amendment is valid, however the provisions imposing buffers on the property are void, yet…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Coastal Ready-Mix Concrete Co. v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Board of AldermenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Jackson v. Guilford County Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  4. Meads v. North Carolina Department of AgricultureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  5. Allred v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re Pedestrian Walkway FailureCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  2. Durand v. IDC Bellingham, LLCMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  3. Musi v. Town of ShallotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  4. Summers v. City of CharlotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. Childress v. Yadkin CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API