Legal Opinion
Newman v. Roach
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 15, 1925No. 15466PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
PINKHAM, C.
This was an action brought by the de endants in error, as plaintiffs, against the plaintiff in error, as defendant, for damages -claimed to have arisen from a breach of a contract by which it is claimed the defendant, William C. Newman, undertook to drill three wells upon certain lands in Okfuskee county.
The petition alleged substantially that plaintiffs are the heirs at law of C. F. Roach, who died April 6, 1920; that about January 10, 1916, the defendant, for a valuable consideration, executed and delivered to C. F. Roach an assignment and agreement, whereby defendant…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Farmers' State Bank of Ada v. KeenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- St. Louis S. F. Ry. Co. v. RichardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Ardizonne v. ArcherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- First Nat. Bank of Mounds v. CoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Broadwell v. Board of Com'rs of Bryan Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Consolidated Cut Stone Co. v. SeidenbachSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- General Paint Corporation v. KramerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
- Brown v. Homestake Exploration Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1934
- Grayson v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp. v. RussellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.