Ardizonne v. Archer
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from Superior Court, Tulsa County; M. A. Breckinridge, Judge. Action by Thomas Jay Archer, an infant, by John W. Archer, his guardian, against Joseph Ardizonne, E. J. Ossenbeek, and others. Judgment for plaintiff against the named defendants and in favor of the other defendants, and the named defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtMiley, J.
This action was commenced in the court below by defendant in error, Thomas Jay Archer, an infant, by his guardian, to recover from plaintiffs in error. Joseph Ardizonne and E. J. Ossenbeek, and the defendants in error W. F. Braun and W. W. Lantz, damages for alleged failure to comply with the covenant in an oil and gas mining lease to drill one well “to the top of the Mississippi lime.” After issues of fact joined, there was trial to the court, a jury being waived, which resulted in decision and judgment in favor of the infant and against the plaintiffs in error far $2,600, and in favor of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chamberlain v. . ParkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Paraffine Oil Co. v. CruceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- American Jobbing Ass'n v. JamesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Manhattan Oil Co. v. CarrellIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Taylor v. North Pacific Coast RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Stewart v. Amerada Hess Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Peevyhouse v. Garland Coal & Mining CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Co. v. BruceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Brown v. Homestake Exploration Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1934
- Samuel G. Whitaker and Elizabeth Whitaker v. Texaco Inc. (Formerly Named the Texas Company), a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.