Legal Opinion

Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp. v. Russell

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 18, 1949No. 3723PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRATTON, Circuit Judge.

Mid-Continent Petroleum Corporation, hereinafter referred to as the company, sued Frank Russell, hereinafter referred to as Russell, to recover damages for breach of contract. The cause was tried to the court without a jury; judgment was •entered’for Russell; and the company appealed.

The judgment was based primarily upon the conclusion of the court that the parties did not enter into a binding contract. That conclusion is challenged. It is contended that a letter written by the company to Russell under date of June 18, 1846, and accepted by Russell the following day,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Suhre v. BuschSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  2. Eysenbach v. Cardinal Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Newman v. RoachSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Okmulgee Producing & Refining Co. v. BaughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. Brach v. MattesonIllinois Supreme Court · 1921

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Vise v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  2. Ellis Canning Company v. BernsteinDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1972
  3. Franklin P. Smith and John S. Adams v. Gibraltar Oil Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
  4. Orient Mid-East Great Lakes Service v. International Export Lines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
  5. Abbell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API