Legal Opinion
Consolidated Cut Stone Co. v. Seidenbach
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 7, 1937No. 21661PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MeRXLL, Speci'al Justice.
This action arose out of the construction of a building in the city of Tulsa upon real estate belonging to J. L. Seidenbach, one of the defendants in error, and was instituted in the district court of Tulsa county, April 22, 1927, by Ed M. Lightfoot to foreclose a mechanic’s lien he asserted against s'aid property. Various lien claimants were parties to the suit, as was the general contractor, J. W. Wilson, and the lien claimants filed pleading's asserting- their respective liens.
The eontr!aet between Seidenbach and Wilson for- the construction of the bpilding was…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Williams v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- United States v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Cooper v. FlesnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Newton v. Consolidated Gas Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Cities Service Co. v. Gulf Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Enco, Inc. v. F. C. Russell Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1957
- Hidalgo Properties, Inc. v. Wachovia Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Liberty Plan Co. v. Francis T. Smith Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- T. Dan Kolker, Inc. v. ShureCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.