Bright Development v. City of Tracy
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PUGLIA, P. J.
Plaintiff Bright Development appeals from a judgment denying its petition for writ of mandate and complaint for declaratory relief. The trial court ruled plaintiff, a developer, was required “to underground” off-site utilities related to a new subdivision constructed by plaintiff. The trial court found that on the date plaintiff’s vesting tentative map application for the proposed subdivision was deemed complete, a City of Tracy ordinance, policy or standard then “in effect” required plaintiff to place underground at its own expense existing, off-site, aboveground…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Glendale City Employees' Ass'n v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Rich v. State Board of OptometryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Johnston v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Shapell Industries, Inc. v. Governing BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- City & County of San Francisco v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Van't Rood v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Cuadra v. MillanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- City of Goleta v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Khan v. Los Angeles City Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Davidson v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.