Legal Opinion

City of Goleta v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 2006No. S129125PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*274Opinion

CORRIGAN, J.

Here we conclude that a newly incorporated city had discretion to disapprove a final subdivision map when the vesting tentative subdivision map had been approved by the county. We also conclude that actions taken by the city did not divest it of this discretion or subject it to estoppel.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The City of Goleta (Goleta or City) was created from unincorporated territory within the County of Santa Barbara (County). After the incorporation process began, Oly Chadmar Sandpiper General Partnership (Sandpiper) submitted a vesting tentative subdivision…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Hughes v. Board of Architectural ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Strong v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Bib'le v. Committee of Bar ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Shea Homes Ltd. Partnership v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Guatay Christian Fellowship v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. People v. CastilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Minish v. Hanuman FellowshipCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. Attard v. Bd. of Supervisors of Contra Costa Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  5. San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District v. General Reinsurance Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2015

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API