Legal Opinion
In re Boyce
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided June 26, 1944No. 4914PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGarrett, Presiding Judge
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals df/the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the examiner *719rejecting three claims numbered. 9,10; and 11, embraced in a divisional application for patent for “Armature Assembling Machines.”
Claim 9 reads as follows:
9. In a coil positioning machine for an armature assembly including a slotted core to receive the side portions of the armature coils, rotatable means for exerting a preliminary inserting pressure upon groups of adjacent coil sides, prior to application of full inserting pressure thereto, said means including…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In re LincolnCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
- Crane v. CarlsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
- Foss v. OglesbyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
- In re WahlCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
- In re SchmidtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In re GruschwitzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- In re CremerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
- In re VoitCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
- In re EmmeyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947
- In re GlockerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.