Legal Opinion

In re Wahl

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 1, 1942No. 4654PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge

Claims 12 to 18, inclusive, of appellant’s application for a patent relating to dyes containing nigrosines or indulines were rejected by the Primary Examiner of the United States Patent Office, and on appeal to the Board of Appeals, the examiner’s action was affirmed. Appellant then filed with the board a petition for reconsideration together with requested amendments which specified definite pro*720portions of the materials used. In its secbnd decision the board, upon the oral statement of the examiner that the process claims, 12, 13, and 14, thus amended, would be. patentable, recommended the…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re RubinfieldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
  2. In Re BoyceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
  3. In re RogoffCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
  4. In re BoyceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
  5. Application of HeritageCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API